Changes on how missing information are reported

[CyrilleB79]

Link to issue

Fixes #5

Description of the issue

• Missing information in the table clutter the result.
• One may remove the row with no information
• Also, using question mark (?) in the result is not a good idea because nothing is spoken.

  Solution

• In Unicode data table, I have removed the question marks appearing when there is no data file available, e.g.:
  • name of character in languages other than English and French
  • CLDR name for languages without CLDR data in NVDA such as Aragonese
• I do not want to totally remove the row or the information when there is a data file for a language but no information for a specific character, e.g. 'A' in CLDR. This means: "There is a CLDR file for your language, e.g. English, but no CLDR information for this specific character".

Remaining questions

• What would the best way to report missing character information (in Unicode table)? So that it could be heard but remaining light.
• While at it what would be the best way to report "[No file]" and "[Not defined]"?

@lukaszgo1, your opinion would be valuable if possible. Thanks. You can test the new version of the add-on in master branch, or better, in the branch of this PR.

[lukaszgo1]

Hi @CyrilleB79 Sorry for not responding earlier - the last, and thankfully final term of my engineering studies was an absolute nightmare, so I'm in the process of catching up with various NVDA related things which I've neglected in the last few months. What is the status here exactly - it looks like this PR makes no code changes (seems all of them are merged into master)? Are questions which you've asked in the initial comment still relevant?

[CyrilleB79]

Sorry, seems that I had forgotten that this branch was associated with a PR. Probably I had just worked in it and merged it without solving all the questions in this PR.

Let's discuss further the issue in #5.