search

Cysharp / R3

The new future of dotnet/reactive and UniRx.
MIT License
1.71k stars 70 forks source link

r3 vs rx.net #189

Closed man-chi closed 2 months ago

man-chi commented 2 months ago

My team is developing VR Unity, a Windows desktop app, and dotnet full-stack on Azure cloud.

we are impressed and appreciate the great work by R3 and uniRx community.

What are the key differences between R3 vs rx.net? kindly advise https://github.com/dotnet/reactive

neuecc commented 2 months ago

As mentioned at the beginning of the ReadMe, the biggest difference is that it does not stop on error. Also, the dotnet/reactive ecosystem is not applicable due to the different interface. This may or may not be a good thing.

man-chi commented 2 months ago

@neuecc thanks for your great feedback.

quick question: our team would like to do a book club for members who will be developing Rx based on R3. Would you recommend the "introduction-to-rx-dotnet" book to start with? https://endjincdn.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ebooks/introduction-to-rx-dotnet/introduction-to-rx-dotnet-2nd-edition.pdf

neuecc commented 2 months ago

I think it is generally good. Many of the concepts can be applied as they are. In my personal opinion, there are a few points where some not-so-good examples are included, but it should not be a major problem.

man-chi commented 2 months ago

may I know whether R3 is built on top of rx. net, any relationship in term of code and dependency between these two frameworks?

neuecc commented 2 months ago

There are no dependencies or shared interfaces between R3 and dotnet/reactive. The relationship is completely independent.