Thank you.
However, the reason why SerializableReactiveProperty doesn't have an IEqualityCompareroverload is that IEqualityCompareris not serializable.
When deserialized, the IEqualityComparerwill be null.
How about making it possible to create a SerializableReactivePropertythat inherits and fixes the IEqualityComparer?
In other words, make it protected instead of public.
Thank you. However, the reason why
SerializableReactivePropertydoesn't have anIEqualityCompareroverload is thatIEqualityCompareris not serializable. When deserialized, theIEqualityComparerwill be null. How about making it possible to create aSerializableReactivePropertythat inherits and fixes theIEqualityComparer? In other words, make it protected instead of public.