Closed jeffry1829 closed 2 weeks ago
I recommend to merge this even though I can't figure out how to fix cuTT. As cuTT is actually contained in cuTensor and cuQuantum, and we won't need it.
I recommend to merge this even though I can't figure out how to fix cuTT. As cuTT is actually contained in cuTensor and cuQuantum, and we won't need it.
Is it possible to drop cuTT dependence completely?
Yes, I can do that
Ying-Jer Kao @.***>於 2024年10月1日 週二,下午4:33寫道:
I recommend to merge this even though I can't figure out how to fix cuTT. As cuTT is actually contained in cuTensor and cuQuantum, and we won't need it.
Is it possible to drop cuTT dependence completely?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Cytnx-dev/Cytnx/pull/480#issuecomment-2385131768, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABUUA2MNBF5POKH6X6UF4TLZZJM4BAVCNFSM6AAAAABOYMERX6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGOBVGEZTCNZWHA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
cuTensor contraction performance has been significantly improved by chooseing TGETT algo
…& add stacktrace print in cytnx_error