Closed JakeHartnell closed 1 year ago
Patch coverage: 96.00
% and project coverage change: +0.12
:tada:
Comparison is base (
9261bb3
) 93.82% compared to head (ae9600a
) 93.94%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Contract | Op Name | Gas Used | Old Gas Used | Gas Diff | File |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
cw721_base | Instantiate__instantiate_cw721_base | 166518 | 164837 | +1.0198% | ci/integration-tests/src/tests/dao_voting_cw721_staked_test.rs:22 |
cw721_base | Store__Store | 3975657 | 3369402 | +17.9930% | ci/integration-tests/src/helpers/chain.rs:98 |
dao_voting_cw4 | Store__Store | 2613465 | 2684822 | -2.6578% | ci/integration-tests/src/helpers/chain.rs:98 |
What about admin of existing cw4-group? When creating new group you set it to be the DAO, maybe this contract should verify that the DAO is the admin or its not set?
Good question! IMO this should not be enforced. What about things like SubDAOs where a certain groups contract may be used across multiple SubDAOs?
That said, folks should exercise caution when using existing contracts if they don't understand who controls them. Feel this should be more of a UX thing.
Made some clean up tickets:
Closes #675