Open bansp opened 2 years ago
This was not changed in TEI.
@anacastrosalgado can you please paste here images of astrolabio and telescopio... we can then provide to TEI-C.
Dear @ttasovac and all:
Here are the two examples, ASTROLABIO and TELESCOPIO, from MORAIS dictionary (1789, 1st edition):
<entry xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="MOR1.DLP.ASTROLABIO" type="mainEntry" xml:lang="pt">
<form type="lemma">
<orth>ASTROLABIO</orth>
</form>
<metamark function="lemmaDelimiter">,</metamark>
<gramGrp>
<gram type="pos" norm="NOUN">ſ.</gram>
<gram type="gen">m.</gram>
</gramGrp>
<sense xml:id="MOR1.DLP.ASTROLABIO.s.1">
<usg type="domain" corresp="#domain.astronomy" resp="#Salgado"/>
<def>inſtrumento Aſtronomico,
de que ſe uſa para ſe tomarem a altura dos
aſtros</def>
<pc>.</pc>
<cit type="example" xml:lang="pt">
<usg type="socioCultural">f.</usg>
<bibl type="attestation" source="#PS.">
<title>Paiva Serm.</title>
<citedRange unit="volume">I</citedRange>
<pc>.</pc>
<citedRange unit="folium">f. 54</citedRange>
</bibl>
<lbl>v.</lbl>
<metamark function="exampleDelimiter">,,</metamark>
<quote>Porque não vos governará por eſſe voſſo aſtrolabio</quote>
<pc>.</pc>
</cit>
</sense>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="MOR1.DLP.TELESCOPIO" type="mainEntry" xml:lang="pt">
<form type="lemma">
<orth>TELESCOPIO</orth>
</form>
<metamark function="lemmaDelimiter">,</metamark>
<gramGrp>
<gram type="pos" norm="NOUN">ſ.</gram>
<gram type="gen">m.</gram>
</gramGrp>
<sense xml:id="MOR1.DLP.TELESCOPIO.s.1">
<usg type="domain" corresp="#domain.astrology" resp="#Salgado"/>
<def>inftrumento óptico de
Aftronomia que ferve de obfervar na terra , ou
no Ceo os objectos remotos, por meio da reflexão
, ou refracção da luz</def>
<pc>.</pc>
</sense>
</entry>
This is a heads up concerning issue https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1800 , which results in a modification of the content model of
<def>
by allowing<usg>
as a child. There is at least one example there that suggests that it might be the proper move and a more philosophical point provided by Christian-Emil, which it might be tempting to dismiss from the position occupied by Lex0, but then, it is sometimes not entirely clear what that position is exactly, and how much of a lexicographer's freedom it needs to constrain, so... just do have a look, please. Another thing is the technical way of implementing the change, and one of the options that were considered appears to come in the scope of issue #38 .