Open ttasovac opened 1 year ago
Just a reminder — we need to agree on suggested values for @role
here. We can finalize this on Wednesday during our meeting.
I'm not sure how to operationalize the distinction between roles that are encoded by use of dedicated elements such as editor
, principal
, sponsor
etc. and those that we are going to provide via @role
. On first sight, @role
seems to specify sub-roles for certain main level roles. Seems a bit arbitrary to me and reminds me to the discussion of pos
, gen
etc. vs. gram@type="pos"
, gram@type="gender"
etc.
Just for comparison, an example from the ParlaMint listPerson:
<person xml:id="AvontroodtYolande">
<persName>
<forename>Yolande</forename>
<surname>Avontroodt</surname>
</persName>
<sex value="F"/>
<birth when="1950-03-09">
<placeName>Antwerpen</placeName>
</birth>
<affiliation from="2003-06-05" to="2007-05-02" ref="#OpenVld" role="member"/>
<affiliation from="2007-06-28" to="2010-05-07" ref="#OpenVld" role="member"/>
<affiliation from="2003-06-05" to="2007-05-02" ref="#be_federal_parliament" role="member"/>
<affiliation from="2007-06-28" to="2010-05-07" ref="#be_federal_parliament" role="member"/>
<figure>
<graphic url="https://www.dekamer.be//site/wwwroot/images/cv/894.gif"/>
</figure>
This is a placeholder from the Lexical Resources Summit 2023.
We've agreed not to recommend anymore
respSatement
but to go for the more elaborate use of author, principal, editor:@role