Discrepancy between proposed and used value for temporal label

[daliboris]

In the Guidleines are examples of the value for temporal label (i.e. marker which identifies the use of a given lexical unit on a scale from old to new. Syn: diachronic marking; diachronic information; time label) .

In examples:

• <usg type="time">Vor 1996 Rechtschreibung Reform</usg>
• <usg type="time" expand="originally">orig</usg>

In chapter 8.2. Types of usage:

• <usg type="time"/>

In the table:

TEI P5 (suggested types): time TEI Lex-0 (required types): temporal

In the <usg>definigtion legal values: time: marker which identifies the use of a given lexical unit on a scale from old to new

There is discrepancy between proposed value for Lex-0 (temporal) in the table and used value (time).

[ttasovac]

resolved in #213

[daliboris]

In the documentation (version 0.9.3) the value time (instead of temporal) is still in the example under the temporal label:

<usg type="time"/>