Closed iljackb closed 5 years ago
Corrected: <ref>
was simply missing from the spec :-}. Sorry.
it still is marking the use of <xr type="crossReference"><ref xml:lang="la">accers-</ref></xr>
as incorrect with the updated schema.. (UPDATE) this is due to the schema requiring @type on which shouldn't be the case as it is only supposed to be required on <xr>
ref/@type
has been made mandatory :-)
In the Lex0 section 5. Structured lexical references (xr/ref), the recommended structure of referenced forms includes structures such as the following (in which
<xr>
must have the child<ref>
):The schema is marking this as an error, I can't see why this is happening in looking at the ODD