Closed ttasovac closed 4 years ago
Possibly related to #12
Technical problem with pena+ capital is xr within form or orth? we had something similar in VMNW. Should be allowed; other ref types of this (oRef etc) are allowed, why not xr
In general: as a lexicographer, who wants to encode a dictionary, I would like the structure to reflect the decisions made by the lexicographer, so encode as entry (related entry) what the lexicographer treated as entry. So no entry for proverbs, nor for collocations or idioms...
This is just a reminder, we've had numerous discussions, but we need to finalize this and decide once for all.
As per #43, we can have
<entry>
within<sense>
. So we can now have the artist formerly known as<re>
appear not just at the entry level, but within senses too.In general, we want to use these nested
<entry>
elements for multiword expressions. I think also probably for proverbs, sayings etc...But we had an interesting Portuguese example today where pena+ capital (capital punishment) is a MWE, and the plus superscript indicates that pena is a cross-reference to the entry pena...
To be continued...