search

DARIAH-ERIC / lexicalresources

Data space of the DARIAH Lexical Resources Working Group
https://dariah-eric.github.io/lexicalresources/
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
18 stars 24 forks source link

Revisiting note and dictScrap #60

Closed sarampcarvalho closed 5 years ago

sarampcarvalho commented 5 years ago

At the Lisbon TEI Masterclass I am encoding an example entry for the upcoming Dictionary of Endometriosis. The entry contains a definition and an additional explanatory note. I understand that note has become deprecated in TEI-Lex0, but dictScrap is currently also not allowed inside a sense.

Furthermore, I am not sure that dictScrap would be appropriate here, because this really is a further expansion on the definition (i.e. it depicts a subtype of the notion being defined) and not some unspecified content.

<entry xml:id="DicEndo.hysterectomy" xml:lang="en">
    <form type="lemma">
        <orth>Hysterectomy</orth>
        <pron><pc>/</pc>ˌhɪstəˈrektəmi<pc>/</pc></pron>
    </form>
    <gramGrp>
        <gram type="pos">noun</gram>
    </gramGrp>
    <sense xml:id="DicEndo.hysterectomy.1">
        <def>Surgical removal of the uterus.</def>
        <!--note is not allowed, but I'm not sure that dictScrap is expressive enough.-->
        <note>When the ovaries and the fallopian tubes are also removed, it is called hysterectomy
            with bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy.</note>
    </sense>
</entry>

I'd appreciate some feedback whenever possible. Best regards, Sara Carvalho

laurentromary commented 5 years ago

I would tend to allow <note> to occur. This complements nicely <def> in your example.

GuidaRamos commented 5 years ago

Having note would be very helpful for the encoding in terminological dictionaries, because ISO definitions can be accompanied by an explicit note. See attched example. colmated natural cork stopper Thanking you, my best regards, Margarida

ttasovac commented 5 years ago

I couldn't agree more. We'll bring back note!

ttasovac commented 5 years ago

@laurentromary will you have a moment to implement this tonight? or should I do look into in the morning?

laurentromary commented 5 years ago

Implemented now. Check the compilation and resulting schema.

ttasovac commented 5 years ago

Merci, Laurent!

A "note" :) for @sarampcarvalho and @GuidaRamos. The newly compiled version of the TEI Lex-0 schema is not yet in our workshop repository. I will add it later during the day (in case we make some more changes in the meantime) and then you'll have to do the whole shebang of merging from upstream to get the latest version. But we can do this at the beginning of the class today...

sarampcarvalho commented 5 years ago

Thank you @laurentromary and @ttasovac! "Note" taken! :)

GuidaRamos commented 5 years ago

Thank you all !!

Enviado do Correio para Windows 10

De: Toma Tasovac Enviado: 4 de julho de 2019 09:11 Para: DARIAH-ERIC/lexicalresources Cc: Guida; Mention Assunto: Re: [DARIAH-ERIC/lexicalresources] Revisiting note and dictScrap(#60)

Merci, Laurent! A "note" :) for @sarampcarvalho and @GuidaRamos. The newly compiled version of the TEI Lex-0 schema is not yet in our workshop repository. I will add it later during the day (in case we make some more changes in the meantime) and then you'll have to do the whole shebang of merging from upstream to get the latest version. But we can do this at the beginning of the class today... — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.