Closed xlhrld closed 4 years ago
That would be an easy fix. Do we have a trace of the actual decision (time vs. temporal). "time" also appears in the Flussschifffahrt example. @ttasovac do you validate this?
Concerning "lang": it does not appear in the schema, but I do see "language": anyone remembers where we got it from?
We should actually put a systematic <desc>
in each <valItem>
: suggestions welcome!
We should actually put a systematic
<desc>
in each<valItem>
: suggestions welcome!
Absolutely. @anacastrosalgado and I have a paper where we defined these, so I will add them as well
Fixed with https://github.com/DARIAH-ERIC/lexicalresources/commit/36a3ca7eacc38da26e8ede46273059ce6b3e489f
@anacastrosalgado when you have a moment, could you please send me caixa-de-óculos and Primavera from our ASIALEX paper, not as an image but in XML, I want to add them to the TEI Lex-0 documentation. You can email them to me...
Perfect, thanks.
In section 6.2 "Types of usage information" of the documentation the closed list of legal values contains
temporal
for Lex-0 where TEI originally featurestime
. This is not reflected in the formal schema which still containstime
and nottemporal
.There is also still TEI's
lang
as a value in the ODD whereas the documentation says this was removed in Lex-0.I propose to change
time
totemporal
and to removelang
in the list of values forusg/@type
to reflect the state of our discussion as presented in the documentation.