Open lifflander opened 7 years ago
yeah, this is probably the right thing to do. I'll add it to the list of things I need to change...
This depends on the resolution of https://github.com/DARMA-tasking/darma-charm-backend/issues/2
Moved to Icebox for now (is that what that's for?) because we're not sure if we're going to do owned_by
any more
If an
AccessHandle<>
in a context ofcreate_concurent_work
is not locally owned by an element in the index range it cannot be captured. Being able to write uniform code with conditionals deeper in the code (if the developer desires) should be possible. Especially considering that determining who owns the AH may require deferring work. I think that propagating the AH in a defunct state would be correct.