Non-blocking follow-on style and consistency post-PR358

[ppebay]

This is a follow-on to PR #357 as some style/consistency issues were noted (but were not blocking for said PR):

• inconsistency in naming of utility classes (in Utils): they should start with lbs, with the exception of:
  • stand-alone scripts (no particular style required for these)
  • imported scripts that come from elsewhere
• inconsistent use of final full stop before triple quotes in docstrings
• still some occurrences of exclamation marks in error/warning outputs

All of the above should be addressed as part of this issue

Reference : https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#package-and-module-names

[tlamonthezie]

This is a follow-on to PR #357 as some style/consistency issues were noted (but were not blocking for said PR):

• inconsistency in naming of utility classes (in Utils): they should start with lbs
• inconsistent use of final full stop before triple quotes in docstrings
• still some occurrences of exclamation marks in error/warning outputs

All of the above should be addressed as part of this issue

Ok Philippe. Regarding docstrings I would recommend what is described at https://realpython.com/documenting-python-code/

For single line docstrings :

"""This is the summary line""" (1 line, no space after or before """)

For multiline docstrings :

"""This is the summary line

This is the further elaboration of the docstring. Within this section,
you can elaborate further on details as appropriate for the situation.
"""

With an empty line after the summary of a class docstring

[ppebay]

Alright, thanks for suggestion @tlamonthezie so please apply changes above throughout entire code base thanks.

[ppebay]

Any update on that one @tlamonthezie ?

[tlamonthezie]

Any update on that one @tlamonthezie ?

Hello @ppebay not for the moment but soon