Closed nlslatt closed 4 months ago
Would forward declaring MPI_Comm
resolve the issue, or we actually need the header there?
PR tests (clang-9, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (clang-13, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (clang-13, alpine, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (intel icpx, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (clang-12, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich, zoltan, json schema test)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (clang-11, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (gcc-10, ubuntu, openmpi, no LB)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (gcc-12, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (clang-14, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (clang-10, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (gcc-8, ubuntu, mpich, address sanitizer)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (gcc-11, ubuntu, mpich, trace runtime, coverage)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (intel icpc, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
Compilation - successful
Testing - passed
PR tests (nvidia cuda 11.2, gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
/vt/src/vt/pipe/pipe_manager.impl.h(133): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB::collectHandler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB>]"
detected during:
instantiation of "auto vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB::collectHandler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB>]"
/vt/src/vt/objgroup/proxy/proxy_objgroup.impl.h(202): here
instantiation of "vt::objgroup::proxy::Proxy<ObjT>::PendingSendType vt::objgroup::proxy::Proxy<ObjT>::reduce<f,Op,Target,Args...>(Target, Args &&...) const [with ObjT=vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB, f=&vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB::collectHandler, Op=vt::collective::PlusOp, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB>, Args=<vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyPayload>]"
/vt/src/vt/vrt/collection/balance/greedylb/greedylb.cc(222): here
/vt/src/vt/pipe/pipe_manager.impl.h(133): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&MyObj::handler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<MyObj>]"
detected during instantiation of "auto vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&MyObj::handler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<MyObj>]"
/vt/examples/callback/callback.cc(147): here
/vt/src/vt/pipe/pipe_manager.impl.h(133): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&colHan, Target=vt::vrt::collection::VrtElmProxy<MyCol, vt::Index1D>]"
detected during instantiation of "auto vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&colHan, Target=vt::vrt::collection::VrtElmProxy<MyCol, vt::Index1D>]"
/vt/examples/callback/callback.cc(153): here
/vt/src/vt/pipe/pipe_manager.impl.h(133): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&MyObj::handler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<MyObj>]"
detected during instantiation of "auto vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&MyObj::handler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<MyObj>]"
/vt/examples/callback/callback.cc(147): here
/vt/src/vt/pipe/pipe_manager.impl.h(133): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&colHan, Target=vt::vrt::collection::VrtElmProxy<MyCol, vt::Index1D>]"
detected during instantiation of "auto vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&colHan, Target=vt::vrt::collection::VrtElmProxy<MyCol, vt::Index1D>]"
/vt/examples/callback/callback.cc(153%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0A ==> And there is more. Read log. <==
PR tests (nvidia cuda 12.2.0, gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich)
Build for db329f8226d6415fea72ff795530daf68ae8e62c (2024-03-25 17:23:01 UTC)
/vt/lib/CLI/CLI/CLI11.hpp(1029): warning #2361-D: invalid narrowing conversion from "double" to "unsigned long"
TT { std::declval<CC>() }
^
detected during:
instantiation of "vt::CLI::detail::is_direct_constructible<T, C>::test [with T=std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string>>, C=double]" based on template arguments <std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string>>, double> at line 1041
instantiation of class "vt::CLI::detail::is_direct_constructible<T, C> [with T=std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string>>, C=double]" at line 5005
instantiation of "void vt::CLI::Option::results(T &) const [with T=std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string>>]" at line 5034
instantiation of "T vt::CLI::Option::as<T>() const [with T=std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string>>]" at line 7315
Remark: The warnings can be suppressed with "-diag-suppress <warning-number>"
/vt/lib/CLI/CLI/CLI11.hpp(1029): warning #2361-D: invalid narrowing conversion from "int" to "unsigned long"
TT { std::declval<CC>() }
^
detected during:
instantiation of "vt::CLI::detail::is_direct_constructible<T, C>::test [with T=std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string>>, C=int]" based on template arguments <std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string>>, int> at line 1041
instantiation of class "vt::CLI::detail::is_direct_constructible<T, C> [with T=std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string>>, C=int]" at line 5005
instantiation of "void vt::CLI::Option::results(T &) const [with T=std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string>>]" at line 5034
instantiation of "T vt::CLI::Option::as<T>() const [with T=std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string>>]" at line 7315
Testing - passed
Would forward declaring
MPI_Comm
resolve the issue, or we actually need the header there?
This was a change I made in my working copy a while back. Now that I think about it, the missing header file may not have been related to my problem at all. I think this was when a problem with modules in my environment was mixing mpich into my OpenMPI and breaking everything. We can probably get away with either your suggestion or doing nothing at all.
Would forward declaring
MPI_Comm
resolve the issue, or we actually need the header there?This was a change I made in my working copy a while back. Now that I think about it, the missing header file may not have been related to my problem at all. I think this was when a problem with modules in my environment was mixing mpich into my OpenMPI and breaking everything. We can probably get away with either your suggestion or doing nothing at all.
I think it does not hurt to just explicitly include it here. It will get included later on without question, so it shouldn't increase compile times to include it here I believe.
Fixes #2254.