I suspect the AMR parsing logic expects "observable" fields to be present, but it isn't a necessary part of the AMR. The petrinet part was done in https://github.com/DARPA-ASKEM/sciml-service/pull/145, but it seems for regnet/stockflow the same optional logic need to be applied.
I suspect the AMR parsing logic expects "observable" fields to be present, but it isn't a necessary part of the AMR. The petrinet part was done in
https://github.com/DARPA-ASKEM/sciml-service/pull/145
, but it seems for regnet/stockflow the same optional logic need to be applied.