codecov[bot]
commented
9 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
7374718) 99.30% compared to head (1ceab02) 99.30%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #312 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 99.30% 99.30% ======================================= Files 86 86 Lines 6796 6796 ======================================= Hits 6749 6749 Misses 47 47 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DASDAE/dascore/pull/312/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DASDAE) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DASDAE/dascore/pull/312/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DASDAE) | `99.30% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DASDAE#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
d-chambers
Description
This PR adds the system architecture to the cache string in the CI systems. Occasionally the OSX CI will fail and issue an "illegal operation error". From some precursory googling this can be due to the system using the wrong binaries. I suspect Github CI may be introducing some Mx chips into the OSX pool, so if the cache is created with a x86 machine then a M2 machine tries to use the complied bits we could get this error.
Of course, this is just speculation but having this extra part in the cache string wont hurt anything so its worth a shot.
Checklist
I have (if applicable):