search

DATEX-II-EU / DatexII

Main repository for issues and bugs for the DATEXII standard
0 stars 0 forks source link

IMPORTED (128) - VMS Publication - Pictogram List (Bugzilla Bug 104) #104

Closed datexii closed 5 years ago

datexii commented 5 years ago

This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github.py

Bugzilla Bug 104

Date: 2019-03-01T11:23:32+01:00 From: @ingeniumfaber To: @iancornwellmottmac

Last updated: 2019-08-23T14:59:59+02:00

datexii commented 24 years ago

Comment 403

Date: 2000-01-01 01:01:01 +0100 From: @ingeniumfaber

The pictogram definition actually comes from a fixed list of road signs and other pictograms. The extension of such a list is not easy and should be done through a level B extension. Another possibility to avoid this drawback is to use the Graphic data dictionary defined by CEN ISO/TS14823 with allows a more flexible way to describe pictograms. It is the way studied in CEN TC278 WG16 for the C-ITS service on In-vehicle signage

datexii commented 24 years ago

Comment 404

Date: 2000-01-01 01:01:01 +0100 From: @iancornwellmottmac

datexii commented 5 years ago

Comment 405

Date: 2019-03-01 11:23:32 +0100 From: bugzilla admin <webmaster@datex2.eu>

--- Bug imported by webmaster@datex2.eu 2019-03-01 11:23 CET ---

This bug was previously known as bug 128 at https://bugzilla.datex2.eu/show_bug.cgi?id=128 This bug blocked bug(s) 2.

Unknown platform CEN. Setting to default platform "All". Bug Status was IN_PROGRESS but everconfirmed was false Setting status to UNCONFIRMED

datexii commented 5 years ago

Comment 1368

Date: 2019-08-23 14:59:59 +0200 From: @iancornwellmottmac

Considered in 16157-4 TC review resolution, at length, with various options proposed and reviewed, but the final decision of WG8 was to have GDD codes with a reduced set of DATEX literals for other pictograms not covered by GDD. The solution was committed and described in the Enquiry draft of 16157-4.