search

DATEX-II-EU / DatexII

Main repository for issues and bugs for the DATEXII standard
0 stars 0 forks source link

Cycle track classification (Bugzilla Bug 449) #449

Open datexii opened 1 year ago

datexii commented 1 year ago

This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github.py

Bugzilla Bug 449

Date: 2023-06-26T10:57:07+02:00 From: Bard de Vries <b.devries@u-trex.nl> To: Jean-Philippe Mechine <Jean-Philippe.Mechin@cerema.fr> CC: @iancornwellmottmac

Last updated: 2024-02-07T14:16:02+01:00

datexii commented 1 year ago

Comment 1841

Date: 2023-06-26 10:57:07 +0200 From: Bard de Vries <b.devries@u-trex.nl>

Agreed definitions for types of cycling infrastructure: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2023-02/ECE-TRANS-WP5-GE5-2023-02e_0.pdf ECF (European Cyclists’ Federation) plays an active role in this expert group .

It gives a clear definition of the various types of cycling infrastructure, although it doesn’t mention the so-called cyclostrada, cycle highways or similar. But it could be a basis for DATEX II/TN-ITS for uniform classification of cycling infrastructure.

datexii commented 7 months ago

Comment 1899

Date: 2024-02-07 14:16:02 +0100 From: @iancornwellmottmac

Note this was at least partially addressed in revision of Part 8 urban extensions, but work may remain for v4.

LBlaive commented 1 month ago

Two values have been added when preparing DATEX II version 3 in 2016-2017, namely “cycleTrack” and “cycleLane” in respectively the “CarriagewayEnum” and the “LaneEnum” classes (issue reported as no 205 in the old bug reporting system).

As well, when preparing CEN/TS 16157-8 in 2019 a supplementary value was added when creating the “LaneEnumExtendedUrban” class, namely “footAndCyclePath”.

The aforementioned UNECE document can be used for adding new values to the “CarriagewayEnum” and the “LaneEnum” classes. As regards the present request, it seems to target specific infrastructures and not only carriageways or lanes. Is the “CarriagewayEnum” class nevertheless the right place or does it need to add information using the “RoadInformation” class (in relation with the issue no 378 ?

Note: What is the use case supported by this issue compared to the DATEX II ecosystem?