search

DATEX-II-EU / DatexII

Main repository for issues and bugs for the DATEXII standard
0 stars 0 forks source link

[Bug]: Package "LinearLocation": requirement or recommendation? #505

Open LBlaive opened 4 months ago

LBlaive commented 4 months ago

What happened?

Comment reported during the Formal Vote ballot in 2018 by FR (no FR029). The note related to the "AlertCLinear" introduces a recommendation regarding the use of different location tables. If the recommendation is not followed, it becomes impossible to correctly interpret the different instances of this class. Idem for "LinearWithinLinearElement". Solution: make the recommendations requirements.

Version

3

Code of Conduct

iancornwell1 commented 2 months ago

Agree.

LBlaive commented 2 months ago

This issue needs to be addressed. The transformation into a requirement (“shall”) seems pertinent.

LBlaive commented 2 months ago

Issue accepted. • The text in the note attached to the “LinearWithinLinearElement” class in the “LinearLocation” class diagram is modified as follows: “When there are multiple instances of this class the attribute linearElementReferenceModel in the associated LinearElement shall be populated to explain the instance.”. • The text in the note attached to the “AlertCLinear” class in the “LinearLocation” class diagram is modified as follows: “When there are multiple instances of AlertCLinear, they shall represent the same location using different location tables.”