search

DATEX-II-EU / DatexII

Main repository for issues and bugs for the DATEXII standard
0 stars 0 forks source link

[Bug]: The proposal for the ICT Rolling plan currently out for commenting by CEN contains a stale link #524

Open JosefKaltwasser opened 2 months ago

JosefKaltwasser commented 2 months ago

What happened?

The proposal for the ICT Rolling plan currently out for commenting by CEN contains the following link: https://docs.datex2.eu/energy/ Invoking the link leads to: image

Version

3

Code of Conduct

iancornwell1 commented 2 months ago

Given that docs.datex2.eu/prettymuchanything also gives a 404, I suggest this is an issue with the draft ICT rolling plan which is not maintained by us, rather than an issue with our docs or anything we maintain. Since both the ICT rolling and a Spanish DGT post point to that URL, it may have existed at one time, but it's not obvious that we should maintain such a URL. I suggest we comment on the rolling plan (which has other obsolete remarks about DATEX II).

NdwMartin commented 2 months ago

Agree with Ian. The links in the rolling plan have not been working since we have the new website when Napcore started. It does not exist on repo.datex2.eu (the predecessor of the current website). The link maybe existed on the website with the old logo. If I understood Bard's mail correct we will comment jointly as SWG4.1 on the Rolling Plan

JosefKaltwasser commented 2 months ago

The TC278 ICT Rolling Plan includes a stale link “https://docs.datex2.eu/energy/”. In a CEN comment you have to provide the correct alternative. I tried to click through the DATEX II documentation to find something appropriate. I assume roughly one third of the links I clicked in the Documentation section are stale. There seem to be inconsistent website structures, e.g. sometime you are sent to https://docs.datex2.eu/mastering/energy/, which is stale. After a while I found https://docs.datex2.eu/levels/mastering/energy/, which works. I don’t think it is a good idea to expose the website to the public in this state. Have tests been run and can they be repeated? I cannot assign Sorin Dumitrescu, so please forward if needed.