Open paregorios opened 7 years ago
Is there any way that this issue can be addressed before release?
@rla2118 do you have any preference for syntax to use in Leiden+ for line groups and lines? cc @jcowey @HolgerEssler @rogerbagnall @jds15
I have no view on this.
I suggest to use
<verse=
instead of the usual <=
to express <lg>
instead of <ab>
, e.g.
<D=.1.column.<verse=
that transforms to
<div n="1" subtype="column" type="textpart"><lg>
Within that block I would regularly use 1., 2. etc. for numbering lines with the difference that they do not transform to <lb/>
(as they do now), but to <l>
wrapped around the whole verse.
This is not going to happen quickly as it is relatively complex. I suggest to you @paregorios punting this to post merge projects
@jcowey you're right given the handling of individual lines.
This request surfaced during the discussion of #112. The assertion is that there is currently no Leiden+ support for xml tags like
<lg>
and<l>
, which are used for verse line groups and lines in TEI/EpiDoc.