Closed johentsch closed 3 years ago
Is it not possible to have two different symbols for the augmented seventh chord like RN+7 (-> which is a minor seventh) and RH+M7 (-> which is a major one)?
For me (as someone using the dataset with a music performance background, but no real classical theory education), a brief search when using the data lead me to this page (and other similar pages) that suggest that a standard augmented 7th chord has a minor 7th. The alternative seems to be commonly called "Augmented major 7th".
It's important that a naive user doesn't make the wrong assumption given the labels.
So, I think @adriannagel's suggestion is a good one.
Or at least, if we use RN+7 to mean something other than an augmented triad with a minor 7th, it needs to be made extremely clear.
Great everyone, that's what we agreed on.
Solution: V+7
has a minor seventh, V+M7
has a major seventh. New table:
Root | Type | Inversions | Chord type |
---|---|---|---|
RN | Major triad | ||
rn | Minor triad | ||
rn | o | Diminished triad | |
RN | + | Augmented triad | |
RN | 7, 65, 43, 2 | Dominant seventh | |
rn | 7, 65, 43, 2 | Minor seventh | |
rn | o | 7, 65, 43, 2 | Diminished seventh |
rn | % | 7, 65, 43, 2 | Half-diminished seventh |
RN | M | 7, 65, 43, 2 | Major seventh |
rn | M | 7, 65, 43, 2 | Minor major seventh |
RN | + | 7, 65, 43, 2 | Augmented (minor) seventh |
RN | +M | 7, 65, 43, 2 | Augmented major seventh |
The mapping from chord features to chord types goes as follows:
The only problem is, that for all seventh chords the size of the seventh is defined but not for the augmented one. I suggest to fix it to always have a major seventh because in the case of the minor seven the chord is so much more likely to be analysed as an alterated dominant
V7(#5)
.