Closed BenjaSanchez closed 4 years ago
Merging #147 into devel will increase coverage by
1.93%
. The diff coverage is92.68%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #147 +/- ##
=========================================
+ Coverage 72.5% 74.44% +1.93%
=========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 822 896 +74
=========================================
+ Hits 596 667 +71
- Misses 226 229 +3
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/simulations/resources.py | 84.21% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/simulations/modeling/adapter.py | 63.88% <100%> (+4.19%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/simulations/storage.py | 84% <100%> (+0.32%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/simulations/schemas.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/simulations/modeling/driven.py | 86.6% <88.88%> (+3.79%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f639f07...a1e7b84. Read the comment docs.
@kvikshaug addressed all of your comments, thanks for the review! I also added some fixes of things I discovered while including your corrections (handle no uncertainty
in proteomics, proper order of inputs in apply_measurements
, save unmatched proteins as warnings and not errors).
Note: This branch should not be merged until the identifier
field of proteomics matches in backend and frontend (see https://github.com/DD-DeCaF/scrum/issues/1167), otherwise we cannot do proper testing in frontend. Will add backend tests next week :)
@kvikshaug done with backend tests! expanded test_measurements_adapter
to test proteomics on both a normal model (no change) and an ecModel. I used a fake proteomics dataset that forces the ecModel to flexibilize 2 proteins, and leaves 1 protein out that is not matched. With this all routines in driven
are also tested, without introducing too much additional computational time (from 32 seconds to 45 seconds)
closes https://github.com/DD-DeCaF/scrum/issues/1085
Proteomics can now be added to the model as constraints using a
driven
card. To enable feasible simulations, a preliminar iterative flexibilization step is added that will make the model grow at least at aminimal_growth
= inputted measurement - uncertainty. If growth rate is not provided, this step is skipped.@kvikshaug @carrascomj I decided to skip for now the option of including
uptake_secretion_rates
as I realized thatapply_measurements
needs to be modified to properly match exchange reactions in ecModels (will create a separate card for this)