Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by igor.ivanov@itseez.com
on 29 Mar 2011 at 2:45
Investigation note:
1. This issue was reproduced with vperf r1866;
2. Failure is appeared because of incorrect processing of data less than 12;
3. There is fix for this case in later versions;
4. successfully checked on r1870(vperf);
5. successfully checked on r33(sockperf);
Original comment by igor.ivanov@itseez.com
on 30 Mar 2011 at 12:01
Please don't use WontFix for this bug!
WontFix is only for bugs that we accept as bug and say that we'll not fix them.
(Hence, we agree to live with them).
For bugs, that you think they are not bugs you should set status to *Invalid*.
However, *this one is valid* (since the report relates to old vperf: 2.1.1801
were the bug exists). Hence, you should indicate it as *fixed*, if you think
it was fixed as part of fixing other bug (probably, the code change for ret<0 ).
Anyhow, please verify it with other burst sizes. Meny told me ~week ago that
he encountered it with bursts of 10000.
Original comment by avne...@gmail.com
on 30 Mar 2011 at 12:20
r33 was verified using at least 1000 iterations with -b option in interval
(1..100000)
r1870 was verified using at least 100 iterations with -b option in interval
(1..100000)
Original comment by igor.ivanov@itseez.com
on 30 Mar 2011 at 12:49
then close it as Fixed.
Original comment by avne...@gmail.com
on 30 Mar 2011 at 12:52
Original comment by igor.ivanov@itseez.com
on 31 Mar 2011 at 7:26
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
avne...@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2011 at 2:16