Open annamorphism opened 2 years ago
Thanks! Will take a look.
Yeah, it seems that the library where we get the manifest from only has a smaller number of folios included?
There is another library that has the whole thing (https://hlbrm.digitale-sammlungen.hebis.de/handschriften-hlbrm/content/pageview/450566), but it doesn't seem like they use a IIIF api? As far as I have been able to find, they have the paths to each of their images encoded directly with the archive record metadata here: https://hlbrm.digitale-sammlungen.hebis.de/handschriften-hlbrm/oai/?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=mets&mode=view&identifier=449618
Should we remove the manifest we have so that this manuscript goes back in the needs IIIF manifest "pile"
yeah, these are the images CantusDB uses and I couldn't find IIIF information for them (but I hoped maybe I just hadn't found it yet...). You'd think the library where it actually lives would have the best images... Anyway I would put this back in the pile, because images without chants aren't really useful for Cantus Ultimus. If it turns out they are out there somewhere (like the folios we have now) we can deal with it then...
Wiesbaden , D-WI1 2 gives images of only ff. 328-434 (seemingly labeled as images 1-214 in the manifest). The chant part of the manuscript is over at 466r--apparently not included in the manifest (?).