search

DEEP-PolyU / KEQA_WSDM19

Knowledge Graph Embedding Based Question Answering
155 stars 51 forks source link

An Issue about the Statistics of FB2M and FB5M #19

Open ruijie-wang-uzh opened 3 years ago

ruijie-wang-uzh commented 3 years ago

Hi, thank you very much for sharing the code and data! But I found an issue with the FB2M and FB5M datasets shared in https://www.dropbox.com/s/9lxudhdfpfkihr1/data.zip.

The paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.02075.pdf) reports the statistics of FB2M and FB5M in Table-2, and it says, for FB2M, No. entities 2,150,604; No. relations 6,701; No. atomic facts 14,180,937; However, in your dataset, for FB2M, No. entities 1,963,130; No. relations 6,701; No. atomic facts 14,174,246;

So, there are differences between the No. entities and No. triples of your data and the reported statistics (issue found in both FB2M and FB5M). I don't know if you have also noticed this issue.

Please bear with me if I made a mistake. Many thanks!

azhe1234 commented 3 years ago

Hi, thank you very much for sharing the code and data! But I found an issue with the FB2M and FB5M datasets shared in https://www.dropbox.com/s/9lxudhdfpfkihr1/data.zip.

The paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.02075.pdf) reports the statistics of FB2M and FB5M in Table-2, and it says, for FB2M, No. entities 2,150,604; No. relations 6,701; No. atomic facts 14,180,937; However, in your dataset, for FB2M, No. entities 1,963,130; No. relations 6,701; No. atomic facts 14,174,246;

So, there are differences between the No. entities and No. triples of your data and the reported statistics (issue found in both FB2M and FB5M). I don't know if you have also noticed this issue.

Please bear with me if I made a mistake. Many thanks! Have you solved this problem? If so, why?