Adjacent

[eirinistam]

We want the distance from the regions to be equal to 0, to have this result we select DGE(0), DLE(0), but the result of the query is empty (I enclose the query and the input datasets.)

query: DS1= SELECT()adj_1; DS2= SELECT()adj_2; RES = JOIN(DGE(0), DLE(0); output:RIGHT) DS1 DS2; Inputs: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/td5txmqmb8vhsc9/AAAJdIZ4o32jYU_rsyfdBEw5a?dl=0

[andreagulino]

Looking at the implementation, DGE and DLE are actually implemented as > and <, so to get distance = 0, as a temporary solution, you could use DGE(-1), DLE(1).

Let me know if it works, so to confirm what I said I will then change the implementation

@eirinistam @marcomass

as a side node, this is the line of code that implements the check on distance

val intersect_distance = (!firstRoundParameters.max.isDefined || firstRoundParameters.max.get > distance) && (!firstRoundParameters.min.isDefined || firstRoundParameters.min.get < distance)

[eirinistam]

With DGE(-1), DLE(1) I have compiled error. @andreagulino @marcomass

[marcomass]

@andreagulino The distal conditions described in the documentation are the following:

• MD(K) (or MINDIST(K), MINDISTANCE(K))
• DLE(N) (or DIST <= N, DISTANCE <= N), with any integer value of N
• DGE(N) (or DIST >= N, DISTANCE >= N), with only values N >= 0 permitted
• DIST < N, DISTANCE < N, with any integer value of N
• DIST > N, DISTANCE > N, with only values N >= 0 permitted Please, verify that all these are implemented correctly. Check also that the cases with negative N values (e.g., DLE(-2)) provide the correct results according to the value of N.

@pp86 Please, add at compiler level also the following cases:

• DL(N), acting as DIST < N, and DISTANCE < N
• DG(N), acting as DIST > N, and DISTANCE > N

[andreagulino]

@marcomass @pp86 you could just change the compiler so that the instantiated AtomicCondition(s) are like this: DL(n) or DIST <n -> DistLess(n) DLE(n) or DIST <=n -> DistLess(n+1) DG(n) or DIST > n -> DistGreater(n) DGE(n) or DIST >= n -> DistGreater(n-1)

and the issue can be closed

[pp86]

I Implemented the option proposed by @andreagulino in the last message.

[marcomass]

@lucananni93 @Sim1Pall8a Please update accordingly the Python library and R package

[Sim1Pall8a]

already fixed

[lucananni93]

fixed