Open tcollett opened 7 years ago
threshold defined by SNR - right? rather than absolute
On 22 July 2016 at 11:39, Thomas Collett notifications@github.com wrote:
We need a threshold on the residual images - things with nothing in the residuals shouldn't be shown to citizens.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/DES-SL/BlueRings/issues/17, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB1EEtpE3GPN_1ZmXSEHyI4spkipnhSVks5qYJ3sgaJpZM4JSpJi .
Yes, definitely - so we need robust estimators for both image signal and image noise.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:40 AM, aprajita notifications@github.com wrote:
threshold defined by SNR - right? rather than absolute
On 22 July 2016 at 11:39, Thomas Collett notifications@github.com wrote:
We need a threshold on the residual images - things with nothing in the residuals shouldn't be shown to citizens.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/DES-SL/BlueRings/issues/17, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB1EEtpE3GPN_1ZmXSEHyI4spkipnhSVks5qYJ3sgaJpZM4JSpJi
.
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/DES-SL/BlueRings/issues/17#issuecomment-234512691, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AArY9yUxgOkXtdCApWFI2wcOPJl2FKJHks5qYJ4wgaJpZM4JSpJi .
We need a threshold on the residual images - things with nothing in the residuals shouldn't be shown to citizens.