Closed kerautret closed 9 years ago
Qt3d was removed from qt5 final (it was with qt5 alpha) and now delayed. Normally for the end of the year with qt 5.2... I will use it for another project so why not for dgtal... So, to be continued...
Le 21/05/2013 22:02, Kerautret a écrit :
I was wondering if we could try to change the dependancies of QGLViewer with QT5 3D possibility ? @mtola https://github.com/mtola you mention it last year, but now since the version 5 is perhaps stabilized, it could be interesting to test ? The advantage is that it remove the dependancy of qglviewer which looks not updated since a year. The potential viewer looks comparable at first view. @mtola https://github.com/mtola have you test it? By the way @dcoeurjo https://github.com/dcoeurjo I don't remember if the OGRE branch was ready to be merged ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/DGtal-team/DGtal/issues/621.
thank you, ha ok yes we will see perhaps for DGtal 1.0 ;) !
OGRE was ready couple of months ago.. I don't know if it is still the case..
OK i check soon again and merge if fine ...
Wait... there was not a lot of motivation for OGRE during last meeting (despite its interactivity).. I could be hard to maintain both QGL and OGRE. Maybe we'd have to make a choice
ok you are right, we can wait
after one year, libQGLViewer is finally always alive... see http://www.libqglviewer.com/
Good news ;) and also available on github ;) https://github.com/GillesDebunne/libQGLViewer
Closing this issue, let's wait a little bit for QT5-QT3D
I'm not working on DGtal for now but just to tell you that qt3d is now out for the first time (Technology Preview) since this summer in qt 5.5: http://www.kdab.com/qt3d-technology-preview-released-qt-5-5-0/
I was wondering if we could try to change the dependancies of QGLViewer with QT5 3D possibility ? @mtola you mention it last year, but now since the version 5 is perhaps stabilized, it could be interesting to test ? The advantage is that it remove the dependancy of qglviewer which looks not updated since a year. The potential viewer looks comparable at first view. @mtola have you test it? By the way @dcoeurjo I don't remember if the OGRE branch was ready to be merged ?