Closed nlessmann closed 1 year ago
The "Projects" page (on the CPG website) splits the projects up into running and finished projects.
The research line pages (on the DIAG website) are manually configured because there is no relationship between projects and research lines - a project lists the people that are involved but not to which research line it belongs. Instead, the research line page lists the projects that belong to the line.
Considerations:
We can also add a boolean option in the markdown for people pages, such that people can switch between showing completed projects yes/no.
There are only a few people in our group (staff members) that stay long enough to create an enormous backlog of old projects, and maybe some would actually still like to showcase finished projects. So I agree, having it optional in some way is probably best.
Discussed during the meeting:
This has been implemented with a flag show_finished_projects in members md files. default to true I also added option to show projects, software via "sections" field. One thing that could still be implemented ( as Jasper noted) is a split between running and finished projects and show it under two different headers
Marina would add code so that there would be headers dividing completed projects from running projects
Fixed by Marina
The profile page of a member lists projects, and these currently include completed projects. We need to discuss whether this is the intended behavior and if not implement a fix.