Closed brittanikedge closed 4 months ago
@tmieno2 Here is something else I noticed while testing some fields today. Any thoughts? For the website, this is no problem, as we will make it an error on the web form if their list of rates doesn't include the SQ.
I feel like for a generic trail design, we should allow for not having status quo rate the same as the rate on the headland. I will fix the problem of not having any rate on headland when rates do not include gc_rate
.
@brittanikedge, okay, so gc_rate is actually assigned correctly. It is a problem of not registering it as one of the rates when creating a factor of rates. When that is done, rate in headland is ignored.
Ah, that makes sense. It's just a mapping problem.
How should we handle not having the SQ in rates? Do we make it an error or do we just add a warning message so that they are aware?
Additional problem: When SQ is not in rates, nothing is applied to headland in trial design.