Closed tmieno2 closed 4 months ago
@tmieno2 Sure, I think we lost the colors in the reports when I moved to using the same figures for viz() and make_report(). So, do you want both of those functions to include a color scheme option? Is there a particular case where someone might want the viridis over say the greens or reds?
On the DIFM website, do you guys use viridi? If no complaints have made, I think we can stick with that color scheme for make_report() and make options available only for viz().
No, we generally use grey and green scales on the website. That is certainly Professor Bullock's preference. I believe viridis came from the viz() function. For the report, we may want to automatically make it grey and green and have options for viz().
Okay, let's do that. Adding grey and green options to viz() and make_report() uses grey or green. There are other things to clean up in viz()
(factor issues #32). I will also make changes in prep_rate()
to remove all the conversion stuff.
Okay, I ended up making Greens the default. I don't think we need to add other palettes as options. I will talk about what they can do in one of the viginettes if they want to change how maps look.
@brittanikedge, when I was fixing the
assign_rates()
, I was checking maps constantly and had trouble seeing whether rates are going up and down. We might want to give other palette options. Not many, but a few, to make high-low rates a bit better. For the report (like a year ago at least), we use the single color with the thickness of color indicating low-high right (green for seed, red for nitrogen)? We probably should give that option.