Open sdeaton75 opened 1 year ago
UnionAll is fixed in 2.6-dev. energyDensity is (I think) an inappropriate name for this property - it should be mechanicalSpecificEnergy. (?)
Can we fix this in 2.5 also, so we don't get invalid DIGGS files when including this property?
Added to list
— Allen Cadden / Principal
From: Scott Deaton @.> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 6:40 AM To: DIGGSml/diggs-schema @.> Cc: Subscribed @.***> Subject: Re: [DIGGSml/diggs-schema] energyDensity UOM Issue (Issue #43)
Can we fix this in 2.5 also, so we don't get invalid DIGGS files when including this property?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/DIGGSml/diggs-schema/issues/43#issuecomment-1375499344, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGJD4COX4FMA4IABE4R3FHLWRP2IJANCNFSM6AAAAAAS5GGDEU. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.**@.>>
We have an issue with the energyDensity element where it's uom attribute doesn't seem to be valid. The units of measure are in the kernel for it, but I don't think it is included in the union of all of the uom values. No matter which of the uom values we input, it won't validate the file.
uom for energy density below.