Closed oleks closed 7 years ago
@kirkedal What do you think?
I find it a good idea.
When making the grading sheets for CompSys, I was thinking of taking out some points for a final distribution. I have previously found that I sometimes adjust some random points i make take it to the level that I find reasonable. Having a way to make this adjustment clear and be able to add a reason, would be great.
On 17 January 2017 at 21:01, Oleks notifications@github.com wrote:
@kirkedal https://github.com/kirkedal What do you think?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/oleks/remarks/issues/11#issuecomment-273282375, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB15lm--aF9wgWdfqE8HeuIt7XFp5iPmks5rTR4pgaJpZM4LmDa8 .
Done, except that bonus points are not accounted for separately, but just contribute to an overall sum. Incidentally, computed sums may exceed the maximum by design.
I had this feature in my shell-scripted format. The idea was that the syntax was slightly different for "bonus judgements":
The template would then be
Bonus points should be accounted separately to keep the overflow counts as they are, and to make bonus points selectively applicable (i.e., only if need be).