CSIP96 and CSIP100: obligation MUST but cardinality 0..n

[nvanderperren]

CSIP96 and CSIP100 have the obligation of MUST, but the cardinality is 0..n. That seems contradictory.

[karinbredenberg]

Thanks for catching that! We will look through all of the similar requirements.

[karinbredenberg]

The suggestion is:

• Update of wording with this PR suggestion #720

Board members acknowledgment of the issue: Tick the box in front of you name to indicate that you have looked at the suggestion.

• [x] Karin Bredenberg (Kommunalförbundet Sydarkivera, chair)
• [x] Anders Bo Nielsen (National Archives of Denmark)
• [ ] Anja Paulič (National Archives of Slovenia)
• [x] Arne-Kristian Groven (National Archives of Norway)
• [ ] Gregor Zavrsnik (Geoarh)
• [x] Janet Anderson (Highbury Research & Development Ltd.)
• [x] Maya Bangerter (Swiss Federal Archives)
• [x] Miguel Ferreira (KEEP Solutions)
• [x] Stephen Mackey (Penwern Limited)
• [x] Sven Schlarb (Austrian Institute of Technology)

Voting (Decision making will be carried out on the basis of majority voting by all eligible members of the Board. In the case of a tied vote, decisions will be made at the discretion of the Chair)

Tick the box in front of you name to say yes to the suggestion.

• [x] Karin Bredenberg (Kommunalförbundet Sydarkivera, chair)
• [x] Anders Bo Nielsen (National Archives of Denmark)
• [ ] Anja Paulič (National Archives of Slovenia)
• [x] Arne-Kristian Groven (National Archives of Norway)
• [ ] Gregor Zavrsnik (Geoarh)
• [x] Janet Anderson (Highbury Research & Development Ltd.)
• [x] Maya Bangerter (Swiss Federal Archives)
• [x] Miguel Ferreira (KEEP Solutions)
• [x] Stephen Mackey (Penwern Limited)
• [x] Sven Schlarb (Austrian Institute of Technology)

[karinbredenberg]

7 DILCIS Board members have acknowledge the issue 7 DILCIS Board members agree with the solution

The PR will be part of the next release of the specifications