search

DILCISBoard / E-ARK-CSIP

E-ARK Common Specification for Information Packages
http://earkcsip.dilcis.eu
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
11 stars 5 forks source link

Using dictionary pairs for requirement history #710

Open carlwilson opened 1 year ago

carlwilson commented 1 year ago

Record the version of the specification in which a requirement was introduced. The validation developers have requested the field. Implementation could be fairly simple, again the examples have had the current XPath and Cardinality information removed see #707 :

<requirement ID="CSIP112" REQLEVEL="MUST" EXAMPLES="structMapExample2">
    <description>
        <head>Type of locator</head>
        <p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The locator type is always used with the value "URL" from the vocabulary in the attribute.</p>
        <dl xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
            <dt>since</dt><dd>v2.1.0</dd>
        </dl>
    </description>
</requirement>
karinbredenberg commented 1 year ago

The issue is going to be discussed by the DILCIS Board

jmaferreira commented 10 months ago

I have nothing to opose to this suggestion. Its just better documentation.

karinbredenberg commented 10 months ago

The DILCIS Board have agreed to approve this suggestion on its meeting 2023-12-06.

carlwilson commented 9 months ago

This can go ahead then. This will need a proper pass over the specifications but @stephenmackey and I should be able to get it done for some time in Feb 2024.

stephenmackey commented 9 months ago

@johnmackey actually, way beyond me. 😊

Stephen Mackey Senior Consultant Penwern Limited +33 668 397 453 @.***

From: Carl Wilson @.> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2024 12:08 AM To: DILCISBoard/E-ARK-CSIP @.> Cc: Stephen Mackey @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [DILCISBoard/E-ARK-CSIP] Using dictionary pairs for requirement history (Issue #710)

This can go ahead then. This will need a proper pass over the specifications but @stephenmackeyhttps://github.com/stephenmackey and I should be able to get it done for some time in Feb 2024.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/DILCISBoard/E-ARK-CSIP/issues/710#issuecomment-1881962583, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIKSFYJ6FTPQONTBLJVM3DDYNR357AVCNFSM6AAAAAA4PSKGDOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQOBRHE3DENJYGM. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

karinbredenberg commented 8 months ago

The suggestion is:

Board members acknowledgment of the issue: Tick the box in front of you name to indicate that you have looked at the suggestion.

Voting (Decision making will be carried out on the basis of majority voting by all eligible members of the Board. In the case of a tied vote, decisions will be made at the discretion of the Chair)

Tick the box in front of you name to say yes to the suggestion.

karinbredenberg commented 8 months ago

7 DILCIS Board members have acknowledge the issue 7 DILCIS Board members agree with the solution

The suggestion of updated encoding of requirement addition will be part of the next release of the specifications.

Issues will be created in the relevant repositories.