Closed cgendreau closed 3 years ago
According to the current definition of Preparation: Process used to move from Material Sample to Catalogued Object.
I think it should be changed to avoid confusion with DNA preparation.
This is how I see DNA preparation (at the moment):
MaterialSample --[Preparation] --> CataloguedObject --[Preparation from the previous preparation] --> Sample (DNA extraction).
It would also allow to add determination(s) since we link determinations to Catalogued Object.
But if we do it that way, I think there is no real purpose for sourceMaterialSample
.
I would suggest to make the following changes:
Process initially used to move from Material Sample to Catalogued Object. The process can then be repeated from a previous preparation.
sourceMaterialSample
from the proposed data model@ssbilkhu you agree?
As of discussion in issue #45
@jmacklin & all: If you agree with the summary this issue can be closed
Agreed!
Do we have it explicitly explained in the information model?
Do we have it explicitly explained in the information model?
We don't, but implicitly it is covered. However, I addressed DNA sampling as an example now. See patch: https://github.com/DINA-Web/dina-model-concepts/pull/51
Merged the PR and closing the issue since we all agree.
From @jmacklin : Is DNA a preparation? It is sampled from an object and then is either a preparation that is destroyed or a preparation that is a tube stored in a freezer. Makes sense as you would need to sub-sample from the tube to do another analysis. Support Biobanking.