Closed dvzrv closed 3 years ago
Yes, all those are expected.
The license situation I will fix in a later release, and "lv2_generate_ttl" is now something you can whitelist in lv2lint. Everything else is "just" a warning, and expected to be there.
Okay, I'll whitelist the symbol then and "not fail" with a reference to this ticket then for the license related topic. Would be nice to close this issue once the license topic is resolved.
Thanks! :)
Sure.
To be clear on the license situation, I simply prefer to have developers write the license name on DPF side, and then have DPF figure out the URL for such license. But this is purely cosmetic, so not done yet as I see it as very low priority.
Now fixed, lv2lint is part of the automated testing. Release to be made in 25 days.
Hi! When packaging 1.4 for Arch Linux I ran lv2lint against all LV2 plugins.
This fails on:
Is there anything that can be done about those failures? I remember from another report against DPF related plugins that the
lv2_generate_ttl
might be non-circumventable. Is that still the case?