Feature/graph charts - Githubissues

shami-sneha commented 7 months ago

I, the author of this PR checked the following requirements for good software quality:

[x] The code is properly formatted (I ran the formatter)
[x] The code is written with our software quality standards (I ran the linter)
[x] The code is written using our code style
[x] Extensive in source documentation has been added
[x] Unit and/or integration tests have been added
[x] All texts have been internationalized with at least the following languages:
- [x] English
- [ ] German
[x] I tried addressing all new accessibility problems displayed in the console and documented if they can't be fixed
[x] I attached performance measurements to prevent performance degradation
[x] I added the changes to the next release section of the changelog

I, the reviewer checked the following things:

[ ] I ran the software once and tried all new and related functionality to this PR
[ ] I looked at all new and changed lines of code and commented on possible problems
[ ] I read the added documentation and checked if it is understandable and clear
[ ] I checked the added tests for completeness
[ ] I checked the internationalized strings for spelling errors
[ ] I checked the performance metrics for problems or unexplained degradation
[ ] I checked that the changes are noted in the changelog

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

Unit Test Results

  1 files +  1 14 suites +14 51s :stopwatch: +51s 32 tests +32 32 :heavy_check_mark: +32 0 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0 33 runs +33 33 :heavy_check_mark: +33 0 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0

Results for commit 3ab5923e. ± Comparison against base commit b1befd55.

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.

NXXR commented 7 months ago

Hey, can you add a description of this PR? A summary what this does and how should suffice.