Closed sdeinert closed 1 year ago
Thank you for the extension. wingComponentSegmentType
does not directly exist in CPACS. I guess it should be part of wingComponentSegmentStructureType
?
Yes, you are right, it should be moved to wingComponentSegmentStructureType
.
Below you can see a screenshot of two wing cutouts.
For both cases the wing symmetry is applied.
I send you the corresponding CPACS file, as I can't figure out how to upload it here.
General agreement on the last stakeholder meeting; no further feedback here. So I will close this topic.
In order to define cutout holes in the wing structure a cutouts element in CPACS is required. An application for this would be to remove a patch in the wing lower skin to have an opening for the main landing gear. Or removing the wing skin forward and aft of the wing box inside the fuselage in case of a carry through wingbox.
Extending the existing wingComponentSegmentType by an optional
wingCutOuts
element:of the type
wingCutOutsType
:which contains a list of cutout definitions
wingCutOutType
that re-use the logic of a wing cell definition based on four border references. Additionally the cutout side needs to be specified, whether theupper
,lower
orboth
sides of the wing skin are affected by the cutout.