Closed kba closed 10 years ago
Yes. it is valid accorindg to Rev1.4.
Yes. Can you make it valid with Rev1.5 and Rev1.6?
And my script will be valid against rev1.6 again, when holdingInstitution asf is introduced.
The unsignedInt is fixed already. I am waiting for the specification (or did I miss the release?).
holdingInstitution should be in Rev1.6-DRAFT already.
But good point about the specs. @edroege @JIwanowa Can you release Rev1.6 now?
How can I check against Rev1.6? help message says only
-version <1.1_Rev1.2 | 1.1_Rev1.3 | 1.1_Rev1.4>
I hope I have the latest version ...
You're way behind, download again. Always download the validator again before you validate, I fix things all the time. There's a has been a build time in the help output for the last 20 versions or so.
Why should i update, when it's not finished.
did you change the download url?
No, the download URI has always been the same.
What do you mean "not finished"? We're on a tight schedule, so please just update the validator regularly.
Not finished, means not finished. 1.6 is stll a DRAFT.
Ok: tested some files
[ERROR] has unknown property http://onto.dm2e.eu/schemas/dm2e/holdingInstitution
the rest seems ok.
Yeah, the OWL file needs to be fixed. You're right. But once thatr's done it will validate. @edroege
Will release the 1.6 model specification and owl file today
Should be up-to-date now, please re-download and re-validate and close if fixed.
bibo:number should be xsd:unsignedInt or untyped, not xsd:int.