Open Fenice-Jin opened 1 year ago
Hello, Do you solved it? I get the same problem Thank you
No, perhaps you may try other computational software packages. Best wishes
396063717 @.***
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "DMFTwDFT-project/DMFTwDFT" @.>; 发送时间: 2024年7月23日(星期二) 下午2:07 @.>; @.**@.>; 主题: Re: [DMFTwDFT-project/DMFTwDFT] Chemical potential and charge number error in LDA+DMFT CSC calculation (Issue #9)
Hello, Do you solved it? I get the same problem Thank you
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Thank you, I send a e-mail to the developer,but it seems that the software is no longer maintained. Best wishes
Dear developers, I'm trying to repeat the example CSC calculation of LaNiO3. I find that though the dmft.x part works as well as in NCSC calculation, running vaspDMFT results in the follow errors:
... LDA part: xc-table for Pade appr. of Perdew found WAVECAR, reading the header POSCAR, INCAR and KPOINTS ok, starting setup FFT: planning ... reading WAVECAR the WAVECAR file was read successfully initial charge from wavefunction DFT+DMFT run with DMFTwDFT entering main loop N E dE d eps ncg rms rms(c) DAV: 1 -0.325174780448E+04 -0.32517E+04 -0.15030E+04 2920 0.177E+03BRMIX: very serious problems the old and the new charge density differ old charge density: 29.94236 new 31.09228 0.108E+03 DAV: 2 -0.117777953625E+04 0.20740E+04 -0.20858E+03 2340 0.404E+02 Fail to find mu, increase mu_iter Fail to find mu, increase mu_iter Fail to find mu, increase mu_iter Fail to find mu, increase mu_iter ... Projection 26 done. Projection 27 done. Projection 28 done. MLWF_WANNIER90: WARNING: wannier90.win seems to contains a UNIT_CELL_CART block already, I hope it applies to the current setup ...
MLWF_WANNIER90: WARNING: wannier90.win seems to contains a ATOMS_CART block already, I hope it applies to the current setup ...
MLWF_WANNIER90: WARNING: wannier90.win seems to contains the MP_GRID tag already, I hope it applies to the current setup ...
MLWF_WANNIER90: WARNING: wannier90.win seems to contains a KPOINTS block already, I hope it applies to the current setup ...
BRMIX: very serious problems the old and the new charge density differ old charge density: 31.54367 new 78.00000 1 F= -.44645718E+03 E0= -.44642453E+03 d E =-.652956E-01 writing wavefunctions
I've tried to increase mu_iter in the INPUT.py from 100 to 1000, but the charge number is still not correct (there are 78 valence electrons. Thanks for any suggestion!