Confusing institutional login options for UGent and UZ Ghent

[laurastandaert]

What version of the DMPRoadmap code are you running? (e.g. v2.2.0) v3.0.2 dmponline.be december2021

Expected behaviour: Have more clear distinction between UGent and UZ Ghent. Ideally name as:

• Ghent university
• Ghent university hospital

Actual behaviour:

Steps to reproduce: Go to login screen

[nicolasfranck]

More context about this: normally, every organisation has one or no shibboleth identifier.

org = Org.find_by_abbreviation("UGent")
org.identifiers.where(identifier_scheme_id: IdentifierScheme.find_by_name("shibboleth").id)

but for the organisation "UGent", this is not true. They share the same templates, so they want to be under the same organisation, but they have their own shibboleth identity provider.

(something to talk about, as this has complicated stuff, and I am not sure how long this is maintainable @laurastandaert @mm449 )

The roadmap code does not validate that there should be one or none, but it is implicitly expected. It has for example a separate "where are you from" page where you can select the shibboleth idp but that by selecting your organisation. When you then select the organisation, it takes the first identifier it finds.

We do not use that "where are you from" page, but put all links on the front page. Unfortunately an Identifier has no label attribute that we can use. For that reason if there is only one identifier, we use the name of the organisation, and if more, we repeat the organisation with the domain name of the identifier appended to it.

See code

BTW: that makes the input form https://dmponline.be/org/admin/4/admin_edit a bit dangerous. You can easily delete the idp for the uzgent.

[osstynd]

Assuming the Guidance might be different, it would only imply that two organisations want to use the same templates. This might be solved through issue 16 (https://github.com/DMPbelgium/roadmap/issues/16) because it allows to copy templates between organisations.