Open laurastandaert opened 2 years ago
+1
+1 for the dropdown of institutions
+1
+1
+1
First problem: user can enter the name of an organisation that is not is stored. The system automatically creates the record. See https://github.com/DMPRoadmap/roadmap/issues/3113
As mentioned in that issue: it would be wise not to store custom orgs, but simply add a field "org_name" to the plan record, as no one but the end user is involved in this organisation.
Second problem: other users may find that unmanaged org and think that all is fine.
See https://github.com/DMPRoadmap/roadmap/issues/3189 See https://github.com/DMPRoadmap/roadmap/issues/3113
@laurastandaert see test.dmponline.be.
I forgot to change the wording..
What version of the DMPRoadmap code are you running? (e.g. v2.2.0) v3.0.6 (dmponline.be april 2022)
Expected behaviour: Avoid confusion wrt organisation and funder: frequent end user help tickets (eg 3 over past 2 weeks)
[x] Change wording (see suggestion below)
[x] Selectbox/dropdown for 'Primary research organisation' should only allow managed organisations
Else the DCC template or non-customized funder templates are unintendedly displayed.
Note that on 'Project details' page, more flexible editing should be possible, of funder (must-have) and if possible of organisation (nice-to-have); without impact on template
Actual behaviour: Current wording suggests the end user to fill the most accurate information for the research projects, while this is actually a form to select the most appropriate template. Primary research organisation allows to select from all organisations, including unmanaged. Since unmanaged organisations do not have templates, the default template (DCC template) is presented while end users assume they will be presented with organisational templates.
Steps to reproduce: Go to Create Plan page