Closed imol-ai closed 4 months ago
This is intentional.
If a name has been configured to be handled locally, I don't expect it to sometimes still send DNS requests to upstream servers.
dnscrypt-proxy
is not meant to be used exclusively with web browsers. If I want to redirect a name to a local server, this includes emails.
Maybe that can be made configurable, but the current behavior is not going to change.
Thanks for the fast reply. For example, blocky solves this by adding a filterUnmappedTypes
flag, which if set to false, doesn't block requests to MX, TXT, etc.
Yes, maybe we can introduce an option to set an explicitly list of record types that will be forwarded. So that people can prevent cloaking PTR records for example, although I can't find of any valid use case for this.
THE TRACKER IS DEDICATED TO KEEPING TRACK OF BUGS, preferably after they have been already discussed and confirmed to be reproducible.
FOR ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CLOSE THIS FORM AND USE THE DISCUSSIONS SECTION INSTEAD: https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy/discussions/categories/q-a