Closed amdomanska closed 3 months ago
I couldn't reproduce this specific error locally.
Currently the raised exception is tested for the specific condition that requires the 3rd attribute of that exception to be serializable. If the condition is not met, the original exception is raised.
In my PR I added the check to see if said attribute is serializable. If it isn't I skip the check and raise the original exception.
I tested the code by raising the appropriate exception manually.
Please let me know if this approach is not correct.
Make sure that nonserializable error are handled correctly
Please don't delete any sections when completing this PR template; instead enter N/A for checkboxes or sections which are not applicable, unless otherwise stated below
See #3830
Describe the scope/purpose of the PR here in as much detail as you like
Categorisation
This PR...
Basic PR Checklist
Instructions for developers:
Instructions for reviewers:
Code Style
No deprecated methods are used
No magic strings/numbers - all strings are in
constants
ormessages
filesES queries are wrapped in a Query object rather than inlined in the code
Where possible our common library functions have been used (e.g. dates manipulated via
dates
)Cleaned up commented out code, etc
Urls are constructed with
url_for
not hard-codedTesting
Unit tests have been added/modified
Functional tests have been added/modified
Code has been run manually in development, and functional tests followed locally
Have CSS/style changes been implemented? If they are of a global scope (e.g. on base HTML elements) have the downstream impacts of the change in other areas of the system been considered?
Documentation
FeatureMap annotations have been added
Documentation updates - if needed - have been identified and prepared for inclusion into main documentation (e.g. added and highlighted/commented as appropriate to this PR)
Core model documentation has been added to if needed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lun2S9vwGbyfy3WjIjgXBm05D-3wWDZ4bp8xiIYfImM/edit
Events and consumers documentation has been added if needed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oIeG5vg-blm2MZCE-7YhwulUlSz6TOUeY8jAftdP9JE/edit
The docs for this branch have been generated and pushed to the doc site (see docs/README.md for details)
Release Readiness
If needed, migration has been created and tested locally
Release sheet has been created, and completed as far as is possible https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Bqx23J1MwXzjrmAygbqlU3YHxN1Wf7zkkRv14eTVLZQ/edit
There has been a recent merge up from
develop
(or other base branch). List the dates of the merges up from develop below 6/5/24Testing
List the Functional Tests that must be run to confirm this feature
N/A
Deployment
What deployment considerations are there? (delete any sections you don't need)
Configuration changes
What configuration changes are included in this PR, and do we need to set specific values for production
Scripts
What scripts need to be run from the PR (e.g. if this is a report generating feature), and when (once, regularly, etc).
Migrations
What migrations need to be run to deploy this
Monitoring
What additional monitoring is required of the application as a result of this feature
New Infrastructure
What new infrastructure does this PR require (e.g. new services that need to run on the back-end).
Continuous Integration
What CI changes are required for this