search

DOCGroup / ACE_TAO

ACE and TAO
https://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt/TAO.html
704 stars 380 forks source link

ACE dev_poll reactor for usage in TAO #2048

Open akrattan opened 1 year ago

akrattan commented 1 year ago

We are using ACE/TAO FOSS 3PP for exposing the CORBA communication and currently we are using the default ORBReactorType i.e., tp (ACE_TP_Reactor).

Tp Reactor type is using the “select()” API which has the limitation on monitoring and supports file descriptor number less than 1024 only. As per the TAO documentation we have seen an another ORBReactorType “dev_poll” which doesn’t have the limitations like “tp” reactor, also “depv_poll” is supported on Linux based platforms as an experimental functionality.

Does experimental functionality is recommended by community to use for production deployments? If yes, will it be supported if there is any issue occurs? If not, can we know their release plans to deliver it for production use cases.

jwillemsen commented 1 year ago

dev poll is still experimental for TAO, not recommended for production usage in TAO. See https://github.com/DOCGroup/ACE_TAO/wiki/ACE-and-TAO-Commercial-support for support, making dev poll fit for production in TAO is something that has to be funded by someone (or someone has to do the hard work).

jwillemsen commented 1 year ago

See also #2045 and the old bugzilla http://bugzilla.dre.vanderbilt.edu/

akrattan commented 1 year ago

If we are going with commercial support. How long do you foresee supporting this functionality for production use and if you can give some indication on commercial or pricing, it will help us to take a decision.

jwillemsen commented 1 year ago

For commercial support please contact us directly (sales@remedy.nl) or one of the other support companies.

pierrebizz commented 1 year ago

Altough anecdotical, we have been testing the devpoll reactor without problems if we don't use SSL