add user consent blog

[lpgoldstein]

Preview

[cthomasONRR]

• All our previous blog titles are sentence case. I think it will look more uniform on the homepage if you made the title sentence case.

• Might be good to link PRA site (https://pra.digital.gov/) here.

• I'm also a little unsure about the term "doing good by" in relation to PRA. Since it is a law, maybe change this to be "To be in compliance with Paperwork Reduction Act requirements, ..."

• I would also find somewhere to link this, maybe embed if you add the the 'to be in compliance" language : https://github.com/DOI-ONRR/research/wiki/Doing-design-and-research-in-the-federal-government#paperwork-reduction-act-pra.

• Can you add a citation (link to the authoritative source) here? Also I think "institutional review board" might be a proper noun (refs: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/institutional-review-boards-irbs-and-protection-human-subjects-clinical-trials; https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-104721)

• Again, citation here

• Sources? https://danachisnell.com/about/

[lpgoldstein]

@eelzi-ONRR I'm not sure what to link to for IRB since each institution has their own. I've incorporated Christine's other comments.

[cthomasONRR]

Ok here's the last of my review:

There are sections of paragraphs where a sentence is just a long list of what the user needs to do. I wonder if this should be broken out in numbered list form to emphasize how much effort the user has to go through. Like this:

The user must:

1. download,
2. open,
3. read and comprehend on their own,
4. add their electronic signature,
5. reattach to the email, and
6. send it back to us.

[eelzi-ONRR]

@lpgoldstein we shouldn't link to anything for IRB. It's too complicated - there's no single IRB site except a confusing login page