Images for AML

[meiqimichelle]

This is a continuation of #1618 to track only the necessary images. Preview of page here .

We need:

1) Growth of AML fund over time

2) Allocation of unappropriated balance

3) Largest grant recipients in FY2016

4) A waterfall/tree map

[ericronne]

This is Indiana 😡

sincerely, Eric Chicago, IL

[coreycaitlin]

Notes from @lukehawbaker:

In the waterfall money graphic...

• The 4.3b bucket should be labelled "Construction of funded or complete reclamation projects"
• We should call the 2.5b bucket "Not yet disbursed", and the largest category within it (2.4b) should be called "Fees collected, not yet disbursed"

In the graph of unappropriated allocations, we should include the phrase "subject to congressional appropriation" after "Federal expenses"

[ericronne]

Updated tree map, with (i believe) accurate proportions!

Note: i changed "complete" to "completed" in the 4.3b note, because it seems more clear to me. Happy to change it back, if i'm off base: "Construction of funded or completed reclamation projects."

[coreycaitlin]

We also need to make a visual for the annual AML fees:

...we should not replace this with an explanation because we can't use the word "declined."

[ericronne]

Moar AML Chartness, Woo!!!

AML funding and spending

Here's the original chart for proofing.

Allocation of unappropriated balance

Here's the original chart for proofing.

Growth of AML fund's unappropriated balance

Here's the original chart for proofing.

Largest grant recipients in FY2016

Here's the original chart for proofing.

And totally tempting fate by doing this, but here are the ...

SVG versions for implementation

[ericronne]

And this one

AML annual fees

The original chart for proofing.

I've added it to the SVG collection for implementation

[lukehawbaker]

@ericronne these look great! Have gone through each and compared to the originals and they look good. The ups and downs in the line graphs are sharper and more severe in these than the originals, but I imagine that's from changing from one year increments to two year increments. They look accurate, so as long as they were built off of the data we provided, we're golden.

Also my sincere apologies that the use of Indiana got past me. I can promise you it was Illinois when I sent it to get converted to an Illustrator file. (Still..as someone born in Chicago...I should have noticed that sooner)

[meiqimichelle]

@lukehawbaker thanks for the review! I'll get these up online on dev momentarily. Where momentarily means...likely within the hour.